cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
New Contributor

Bandwidth or Traffic Shaping statement for a VLAN associated with a WAN interface for an FE circuit? (w/QoS as well)

Currently we are using the Bandwidth statement on a VLAN associated with a WAN interface on a NET 1335 running R11.5. We are using this on our QoS Maps as well. I am wondering if it would be better, overall, to place a Traffic-Shape Rate command on the VLAN interface and shape average on the QoS Maps instead of the Bandwidth statement and why?

Example of what we have in place... (3MB FE circuit)

INT and VLAN:

interface gigabit-switchport 0/1

  speed 1000 nonegotiate

  spanning-tree edgeport

  no shutdown

  switchport access vlan 2

interface vlan 2

  ip address  x.x.x.x

  ip flow ingress

  ip flow egress

  bandwidth 3000

  qos-policy out verizon

  ip route-cache express

  no shutdown

QoS Maps:

qos map verizon 20

  match list af3

  bandwidth 768

  set dscp af31

qos map verizon 30

  match list af2

  bandwidth 768

  set dscp af21

qos map verizon 40

  match list af1

  bandwidth 512

  set dscp af11

qos map verizon 50

  match any

  set dscp default

  shape average 952000

Thank you for any assistance that you can provide!

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Reply
Highlighted
New Contributor

Re: Bandwidth or Traffic Shaping statement for a VLAN associated with a WAN interface for an FE circuit? (w/QoS as well)

bump

0 Kudos
Reply